Syrian Repression, the Chinese-Russian Veto, and U.S. Hypocrisy
Column
The Russian and Chinese veto of the moderate and reasonable UN Security Council resolution was unconscionable, but the United States may have its own hypocrisy to thank.
Column
The Russian and Chinese veto of the moderate and reasonable UN Security Council resolution was unconscionable, but the United States may have its own hypocrisy to thank.
Media Advisory
Can we close the Futenma U.S. Marine Base in Japan Without Constructing Additional Marine Bases in Okinawa?
Blog
The term "U.S. assets" is a little too open to interpretation.
A major debate is underway in China on a proposed law that would significantly increase the power and protection of Chinese workers. Major U.S. and European corporations—acting through the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai, the U.S.-China Business Council, and the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China— are trying to gut the Chinese legislation.
China's proposed legislation will not eliminate its labor problems. The law will not provide Chinese workers with the right to strike or the right to independent trade unions with leaders of their own choosing. But foreign corporations are attacking the legislation not because it provides workers too little protection but because it provides them too much.
Foreign corporations fear that the law protecting Chinese workers may eliminate their cheap labor costs. Foreign corporations have another, less obvious, motive for opposing protections for Chinese workers. The ability to hire cheap labor in China has put downward pressure on wages and workers' conditions around the globe. China plays a key role in setting global wage norms.
The U.S. government should:
For the full version, go to Labor Rights in China.
Jeremy Brecher and Tim Costello, "Labor in China" (Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus, December 19, 2006)