Using Pro-Life to Sell Nuclear Disarmament
Blog
Evangelicals and Catholics have been known to conflate abortion and nuclear war.
Blog
Evangelicals and Catholics have been known to conflate abortion and nuclear war.
Blog
A state whose national-security policy is founded on duplicity founders there.
Column
The Russian and Chinese veto of the moderate and reasonable UN Security Council resolution was unconscionable, but the United States may have its own hypocrisy to thank.
The UN needs a rapidly deployable UN Emergency Peace Service (UNEPS). Such a force, if it currently existed, would already be on the ground in Lebanon, creating a secure environment for a replacement team of more permanent peacekeepers. In Sudan, UNEPS could have been deployed with 48 hours of the May peace agreement to stabilize a chaotic situation. Currently the UN does not have the capacity to respond rapidly to emergencies around the world.
Working within a single command structure, UNEPS would employ 12-18,000 military personnel, civilian police, legal experts, and relief professionals from various countries. This force would be carefully selected, expertly trained, and coherently organized, so it would not fail due to a lack of skills, equipment, experience in resolving conflicts, or gender, national, or religious imbalance. The new body would operate out of mobile field headquarters that would enable deployment within 48 hours of a UN authorization. UNEPS would complement existing peace operations capacities and operate according to a "first in first out" deployment philosophy.
Progress on moving forward with UNEPS requires:
For the full article, go to Lebanon, Sudan: Who You Gonna Call?.
Don Kraus, "Why We Need a UN Rapid Response" (Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus, August 30, 2006)