Foreign Policy in Focus - A Think Tank Without Walls
Foreign Policy In Focus

FPIF Commentary

The Israeli Raid in Jericho: The Background

Stephen Zunes | March 17, 2006

Editor: John Gershman, IRC

printable PDF version

Email this page to a friend

Comment on this article

Foreign Policy In Focus

The origins of the March 14 Israeli raid of a Palestinian prison in Jericho are rooted in another Israeli raid on a Palestinian city in 2001.

On August 27 of that year, Israeli occupation forces assaulted the offices of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) with a U.S.-supplied helicopter gunship and missiles. Their target was PFLP leader Abu Ali Mustafa, who was killed instantly. The PFLP vowed to retaliate.

The PFLP, a Marxist movement notorious for engineering a spate of airline hijackings in the early 1970s, had in previous years ended its involvement in international terrorism and had returned from exile to emerge as part of the secular leftist opposition to both the Fatah-dominated Palestine Authority and the Islamist Hamas. As a legal political party, the PFLP regularly put forward candidates in Palestinian elections, though their percentage of the popular vote rarely scored better than the low single digits. The PFLP also maintained an armed militia, though--unlike Hamas and Islamic Jihad--it primarily targeted the Israeli military and police in the occupied territories rather than civilians inside Israel.

Seven weeks after the Israeli assassination of their leader, a PFLP militant assassinated Rehavam Zeevi, head of the far-right Moledet Party, who had been serving as Israeli Tourism Minister in Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's coalition government. The Moledet Party--which subsequently merged with other far right parties to form the National Alliance--is even more extremist in ideology than the PFLP, calling for the ethnic cleansing of all Palestinians from Israel and the occupied territories.

In response to Mustafa's murder, the State Department issued only a mild statement reiterating its opposition to Israel's assassination policy. In subsequent months, the Bush administration--with the encouragement of both Republican and Democratic congressional leaders--dropped even this nominal opposition and began to openly defend assassinations by Israeli death squads of suspected Palestinian militants. By contrast, President Bush personally condemned Zeevi's murder, criticized the Palestinian Authority's failure to jail the suspected assassins and PFLP leaders, and demanded that they be punished.

When Israel violently re-occupied Ramallah four months later and launched a six-week siege on Palestinian President Yasir Arafat's offices, President Bush expressed his understanding for the Israeli action--otherwise universally condemned in the international community--on the grounds that the suspected PFLP assassin and three alleged accomplices had sought refuge there. Bush noted how "these people are accused of killing a cabinet official of the Israel government. I can understand why the prime minister wants them brought to justice." He added, "They should be brought to justice if they killed this man in cold blood."

By contrast, there were no American demands to bring to justice the Israeli helicopter pilots or Israeli political and military leaders who were responsible for Mustafa's assassination. Similarly, there was no U.S. criticism of the 1988 Israeli assassination of a member of Arafat's cabinet, Defense Minister Khalid al-Wazir in Tunisia, much less a demand that those responsible for his murder be brought to justice. (An investigation by the Israeli newspaper Maariv revealed that the leader of the seaborne command center who oversaw al-Wazir's murder was Israel's then-deputy military chief Ehud Barak, who would later become Israeli prime minister, widely praised by President Bill Clinton and others as a great peacemaker.)

Arafat finally agreed to have the four PFLP militants implicated in the assassination--along with Ahmed Saadat, Mustafa's successor as PFLP leader--jailed in return for the Israelis lifting the siege, even though the Palestinian judiciary cleared him of involvement. Arafat was also forced to agree to imprison a sixth man, Palestinian Authority finance chief Fuad Shubaki, for attempting to smuggle arms from Iran. The U.S. position has been that while it is legitimate for the United States to send arms to the Israeli government to facilitate their occupation of Palestinian territory seized by Israel in the 1967 war, it is illegitimate for the Palestinians to import arms to resist the occupation.

Though the Bush administration had rejected calls from the Palestinians to dispatch U.S. peacekeeping forces to the West Bank to separate the two sides and protect civilian populations, President Bush--not trusting the Palestinian Authority to keep the six men incarcerated--insisted that American servicemen, later joined by British servicemen, be sent into the West Bank city of Jericho to help guard the prisoners.

While U.S. and British officials had complained in recent weeks of a deteriorating security climate, they did not give Palestinian officials any notice of their sudden departure on March 14. They did, however, apparently inform Israeli officials. Though there was no evidence to suggest that the departure of the foreign prison guards would lead to an imminent release of the six men, Israeli forces moved into Jericho and assaulted the prison, killing two guards and wounding two dozen others, kidnapping the six prisoners and bringing them to Israel.

The widespread Palestinian anger in response to the Israeli attack and kidnappings went well beyond those who support the PFLP's ideology or its retaliatory assassination of Zeevi. This latest violation of Palestine's limited sovereignty, with the apparent collusion of the United States--the supposed guarantor of the Oslo peace process and the detention agreement--and Great Britain deepens the sense of humiliation from the nearly 29 years of U.S.-backed Israeli occupation of the West Bank. It has weakened moderate Palestinian leaders like President Mahmoud Abbas, who has argued that the U.S.-brokered peace process offers hope for the establishment of a viable Palestinian state alongside Israel, while strengthening Hamas and other extremists who reject the peace process and Israel's very right to exist.

Stephen Zunes is the Middle East editor of Foreign Policy In Focus (www.fpif.org). He is a professor of Politics and author of Tinderbox: U.S. Middle East Policy and the Roots of Terrorism (Common Courage Press, 2003).

 

Subscribe to
World Beat

FPIF's weekly ezine


Support FPIF


Published by Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF), a project of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS, online at www.ips-dc.org). Copyright © 2009, Institute for Policy Studies.

Recommended citation:
Stephen Zunes, "The Israeli Raid in Jericho: The Background," (Silver City, NM & Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus, March 17, 2006).

Web location:
http://fpif.org/fpiftxt/3159

Production Information:
Author(s): Stephen Zunes
Editor(s): John Gershman, IRC
Production: Tonya Cannariato, IRC

Latest Comments & Conversation Area
Editor's Note: FPIF.org editors read and approve each comment. Comments are checked for content only; spelling and grammar errors are not corrected and comments that include vulgar language or libelous content are rejected.
 
Name GammaRayVision Date: Apr 03, 2006

Curious that when the Israelis want to kill activist X they know where he is and get it done. They want somebody in jail, cell 127, they get him.

Consider they must have all types of electronic eavesdropping equipment, in which case they can have a pretty good idea of who's where and what's happening.

Add the best equipment the U$ can pay for, and undeniably crack soldiers; it's a strange coincidence that as soon as some minuscule step is about to be taken to improve the situation, a suicide bomber is able to waltz in and do his stuff, torpedoing any step forward.

A "blaphemous" thought, but I believe that these bombers are allowed in instead of intercepted, in the interest of propaganda and maintaining the status quo.

The election of Hamas means no negotiations are possible, due to their extreme views. Yet, if Fatah had won, negotiatons would also have been impossible, due to their corruption and lack of control. Heads I win, tails you lose.

Name the right path fellower Date: Apr 21, 2006
This is a wise site in what is really happining not on what Mr Bush is saying. Thank you for your understanding.
Name Aaron M Date: May 01, 2006
"The election of Hamas means no negotiations are possible, due to their extreme views. Yet, if Fatah had won, negotiatons would also have been impossible, due to their corruption and lack of control. Heads I win, tails you lose."

- Your comment goes to show that you have absolutely no knowledge of international law, and that is why people such as yourself can only come up with easy answers to a complicated situation. Again, an organization like Hamas (or even Fatah for that matter) would recognize the state of Israel, and seriously negotiate for peace if Tel Aviv completely withdraws from the Occupied Territories in the West Bank - and goes back to the pre-1967 borders according to the numerous United Nations Security Council Resolutions calling for an end to Israeli occupation on Palestinian land. But as we all know, it's very easy to dismiss any movement of resistance against injustice and oppression, and label it as a "terrorist organization" by foreign powers when they, themselves, support a state that violates international law and human rights on just about every level on a daily basis. By now, you should realize that an illegal occupation of a foreign land will only bring about consequences such as terrorism against innocent civilians, just like the US invasion of Iraq can perfectly demonstrate that fact very well in case if you haven't figured that out as yet.
Discussion for this article has been closed.
 
Contact FPIF's webmaster with inquiries regarding the functionality of this website.
Copyright © 2009, Institute for Policy Studies.
 

Support FPIF

You Might Also Like:
 

Related Coverage of Human Rights Issues

Book Review: 'The Slave Next Door'
May 18, 2009

John McCain and the International Republican Institute
Jun 27, 2008

Sharp Attack Unwarranted
Jun 27, 2008

Related Mideast Coverage

Bipartisan Attack on International Humanitarian Law
Nov 4, 2009

Toward an Abrahamic Peace
Oct 9, 2009

The Goldstone Report: Killing the Messenger
Oct 7, 2009

Related Coverage of Military Issues

Poem, 'When I was Torn by War'
Oct 6, 2009

Poem, 'Dear Legislators'
Oct 6, 2009

Their Martyrs and Our Heroes
Aug 6, 2009