FPIF 60-Second Expert |
Talking Points for the Time-Crunched
Whither Mexico?
Laura Carlsen, IRC | September 22, 2006
Editor: John Feffer, IRC
|


|
|
|
On September 16, over one million people voted to recognize center-left leader Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador as the “legitimate president” of Mexico. These delegates to the National Democratic Convention (NDC) agreed to inaugurate their president on November 21—nine days before the inauguration of the officially recognized candidate, Felipe Calderon.
After months of protesting fraud, the convention represented a change in direction. The distinction between the demand for a fair vote count and the need to redress deeply felt social wrongs has been subsumed into a general movement for fundamental reforms.
The Mexican election results remain murky because:
- The official results showed obvious flaws: a high number of nullified votes, numerical differences between tally sheets and actual ballots, additional and missing ballots, and adulterated official results.
- Electoral officials have unaccountably refused any public review of ballots.
- The Electoral Tribunal has allowed the recount of only 9% of the precincts and has nullified certain polling place results without releasing clear, specific data to back up their decisions.
Lopez Obrador has offered an alternative through anti-poverty measures and a rejection of hardline neoliberal policies. His plan is far from radical, but it has drawn the fire of powerful business interests at home and abroad. The Bush administration would rather not have another defection from the ranks of economic orthodoxy at a time when much of Latin America shows signs of leaving the fold.
Even if Calderon were miraculously able to consolidate power over the coming months, a broad movement calling for major institutional reforms will be on the political scene for a long time to come.
For the full article, go to Mexico's Two Presidents.
|
 Please donate your economic stimulus rebate to a progressive future.
|
|
|
Published by Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF), a project of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS, online at www.ips-dc.org). Copyright © 2008, Institute for Policy Studies.
Recommended citation:
Laura Carlsen, "Whither Mexico?" 60-Second Expert (Silver City, NM and Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus, September 22, 2006).
Web location:
http://fpif.org/fpiftxt/3539
Production Information:
Author(s): Laura Carlsen, IRC
Editor(s): John Feffer, IRC
Production: Chellee Chase-Saiz, IRC |
|
Latest Comments & Conversation Area
Editor's Note: FPIF.org editors read and approve each comment.
Comments are checked for content only; spelling and grammar errors are not
corrected and comments that include vulgar language or libelous content are
rejected. |
| |
| Name: |
Sergio |
Date: Sep 27, 2006 |
| A lesson from history: all this thing about a "parallel government" already happened in 1988. The PRI won, PAN and PRD declared a massive fraud, and the PAN president formed a parallel government in protest. No other than Vicente Fox was named agriculture minister in Clouthier's government. How did Clouthier's parallel goverment do? It withered away under the relentless pressure of daily routine, of business-as-usual.
Lopez Obrador will very likely suffer a similar fate. |
|
| Name: |
Carlos Trevino |
Date: Oct 01, 2006 |
| I think most of the rejection to AMLO comes not from his economic policy but from his habit of disqualifying everyone that doesn't agree with him. The latest one is none other than the loser of 1988 elections Cuauhtemoc Cardenas, founder of the PRD, who criticized the AMLO movement of being radical (due to its unwillingness to use the institutions to fight politically) and undemocratic. It's easy to miss the point that the PRD is the 2nd political force in the country (measured by the number of representatives in the congress) and some argue it could have easily won the presidential election if not for political mistakes done by AMLO. |
|
| Discussion for this article has been closed. |
| |
Contact FPIF's webmaster with inquiries regarding the functionality of this website.
Copyright © 2008, Institute for Policy Studies.
|
|
|
|