Foreign Policy in Focus - A Think Tank Without Walls
Foreign Policy In Focus

FPIF Commentary

Report from the Front Lines

Iraqis in Despair

Adil E. Shamoo and Bonnie Bricker | March 12, 2007

Editor: Erik Leaver, IPS

Email this page to a friend

Comment on this article

Foreign Policy In Focus

Picuture of FallujahWhile politicians in Washington argue over the future of Iraq, half a world away a bloody battle for the soul of Iraq is being fought by Iraqis who are paying a high price for the U.S. occupation.

When asked about Iraq and its future, many Iraqis have the same refrain: there is no more Iraq, Iraq is lost. Others say: make us safe or leave us alone.

These desperate voices are heard from inside Iraq and from Iraqis abroad. Just as Americans saw in the aftermath of Katrina the stark contrast of those who had and had not the means to leave the devastation, in Iraq those who have the means hope to escape death and suffering by leaving their homes. Those who have the means, nearly two million of them according to U. N. sources, have fled Iraq to countries in which they try to protect their families in strange lands and often to inhospitable environments. Within Iraq an additional 1.8 million refugees are unable to leave their country but also are unable to live safely in their homes. Those Iraqis who have no means to leave Iraq are struggling to survive under a situation described in the latest National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) as “more complex” than a civil war.

This war has lasted four years--an equivalent to the length of the American Civil War or World War II. Iraqis have had enough and their desire is to be left alone regardless of the consequences. In a September 2006 World Public Opinion poll (conducted by the Program on International Policy Attitudes at the University of Maryland), 70 percent of Iraqis wanted the U.S. to commit to withdrawal within the year. Support for attacks on U.S. forces had grown to 60 percent of the Iraqi population. The majority of Iraqis reported that the presence of the United States created more conflict. The sentiment is clear, if left alone, Iraqis themselves will determine the consequences of this conflict instead of the actions of foreign troops.

President Bush and his supporters hide behind the possibility that if U.S. troops leave, there will be a blood bath. According to the latest NIE four simultaneous wars are being fought in Iraq by various groups: "Shia on Shia," "al-Qaeda," "Sunni insurgents," and "criminals." For Iraqis, they are better defined as thugs, foreign fighters, and former neighbors turned into insurgents.

Before the U. S. invasion of Iraq, Kurds, Sunnis and Shi’ites lived together in Iraq for hundreds of years without much violence. Yes, there were some ethnic, religious and sectarian differences; but intermarriage among groups was common and neighbors looked out for one another regardless of sectarian differences. Following the U. S. invasion, the formulation of Iraq’s Coalition Provisional Authority based on ethnic demographics contributed a great deal to unearthing old fissures and deepening ethnic hostilities.

The fighting against U.S. troops and between these groups creates as many as 100 or more deaths per day. Thirty-four thousand Iraqis were killed in the conflict in the last year according to the Brookings Institute's Iraq Index, confirming that Iraq is already in the midst of a civil war. According to the Iraq Coalition Casualty Count, deaths of Iraqi security forces and civilians numbered over 1,800 in January 2007, following months of attacks in which death rates by the month for Iraqis ranged from 1,500 to more than 3,500 (in September 2006). While the February 2007 count has been less, the change in attacks, including targeting chlorine trucks, is an ominous change that could lead to even greater challenges.

Some fear that the Iranians may gain influence if the U.S. leaves and that the U.S. will not be able to secure the flow of Iraqi oil to fill our growing energy needs. These fears should not be dismissed. If the U.S. leaves, the Iranians may temporarily have more influence than the U.S. But if the Iranians exercise any colonial tendencies in Iraq, they will suffer the same consequences the U.S. has had in Iraq. Iraq may become their burial ground and the undoing of the Ahmadinejad government. There is a great deal of discontent among Iranians towards their current regime. If the U.S. could not conquer Iraq, the Iranians will not be able to either.

The war and occupation has been fanning the flames of violence for too long in Iraq. It is time to let the Iraqi people extinguish the flames and begin their long process of rebuilding their nation.

Adil E. Shamoo born and raised in Baghdad is a professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. He writes on ethics and public policy and can be reached at: ashamoo@umaryland.edu. Bonnie Bricker is a freelance writer. Both are contributors to Foreign Policy In Focus.

 

Subscribe to
World Beat

FPIF's weekly ezine


Support FPIF


Published by Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF), a project of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS, online at www.ips-dc.org). Copyright © 2008, Institute for Policy Studies.

Recommended citation:
Adil E. Shamoo and Bonnie Bricker, "Iraqis in Despair," (Silver City, NM and Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus, March 12, 2007).

Web location:
http://fpif.org/fpiftxt/4057

Production Information:
Author(s): Adil E. Shamoo and Bonnie Bricker
Editor(s): Erik Leaver, IPS
Production: Erik Leaver, IPS

Latest Comments & Conversation Area
Editor's Note: FPIF.org editors read and approve each comment. Comments are checked for content only; spelling and grammar errors are not corrected and comments that include vulgar language or libelous content are rejected.
 
Name Jeff Weintraub Date: Mar 13, 2007
"Before the U. S. invasion of Iraq, Kurds, Sunnis and Shi’ites lived together in Iraq for hundreds of years without much violence." Is this supposed to be serious? Or does genocidal mass murder, for example, not count as "much violence"?
Name gbsage Date: Mar 15, 2007
The authors seem to say, though without any supporting argument, that somehow if the US leaves then Iraqis will stop killing Iraqis. I wish they would explain the logic behind that assumption. Perhaps the argument is absent because everything points to an even greater disorder taking hold of Iraq if the US, being the only strong military presence in the country, leaves. I think the authors are somewhat naive in thinking that Iraqis, i.e., the Kurds, the Shia and the Sunni, are simply waiting for the US to leave so that they can stop killing each other and start intermarrying, and getting back to the supposed hundreds of years of joyful coexistence. The scenario is a little more complex, I think.
Name Zulkifli Rahman Date: Mar 15, 2007
Saddam was mean to his enemies. He did not mistreat the general population of Iraq who were not his enemies or destroy the cradle of Islamic civilization. Iraq could never be a threat to the US directly or indirectly, so why is the US govt destroying Iraq thus created untold miseries to millions of its innocent people. Why?
Discussion for this article has been closed.
 
Contact FPIF's webmaster with inquiries regarding the functionality of this website.
Copyright © 2008, Institute for Policy Studies.
 
You Might Also Like:
 

Related Iraq Coverage

Interview with Joseph Stiglitz
Mar 27, 2008

Bush at the Pentagon
Mar 20, 2008

Memorializing Iraq
Mar 19, 2008

Related Mideast Coverage

The Candidates on Iran
Apr 4, 2008

Five Years Later
Mar 14, 2008

Nervously and Rapidly, Iran Courts Egypt
Feb 14, 2008