Foreign Policy in Focus - A Think Tank Without Walls
Foreign Policy In Focus

FPIF Commentary

Clinton in Indonesia: What She Missed

Andre Vltchek | March 18, 2009

Editor: John Feffer

Email this page to a friend

Comment on this article

Foreign Policy In Focus

She came to Indonesia as the new Secretary of State, and she came, she said, as a friend. Hilary Clinton met Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and later told the press that she "wanted Jakarta's advice and counsel about how to reach out not only to the Muslim world but to Asia and beyond." This overture from Barack Obama's administration signaled the direction U.S. policy will take toward the fourth most populous nation on Earth.

Indonesia was an obvious stop on Clinton's four-country tour of Asia. Less clear were Clinton's comments. Clinton "praised the democratization process in Indonesia, which is a model for Islam." But then she added: "As I travel around the world over the next years, I will be saying to people: If you want to know whether Islam, democracy, modernity and women's rights can coexist, go to Indonesia."

That is, of course, exactly what the Indonesian political establishment, religious leaders, and the great majority of Indonesian people wanted to hear. But it couldn't be further from the truth.

In her remarks in Indonesia, Clinton made no mention of genocide in Papua. She neglected to speak of how political and militant Islam is openly defying the constitution of Indonesia and taking control of several parts of the country. And she was silent about how the business and political elite treats the impoverished, uneducated, and unrepresented majority of the people.

Religious Intolerance

In direct contrast to Clinton's words, Indonesia and its largest religion have become increasingly intolerant. As Clinton praised moderate Islam, less than a one-hour drive from the center of Jakarta, at an ASEAN scout jamboree site in the Cibubur suburb, hundreds of girls are still living in makeshift conditions more than six months after a brutal attack against their SETIA Evangelical School of Theology in East Jakarta. The attackers cried "Jihad, Allahu Akbar, attack, kill them, burn them," and the crowd that gathered shouted similar slogans. During and after the attack, the police did practically nothing. More than 20 students suffered injuries, some from machetes. Instead of protecting the children and their right to stay on the campus, the authorities evacuated them to avoid confrontation with the Islamists.

In June 2008, members of the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) attacked secularists commemorating Sukarno's relatively tolerant Pancasila state ideology at the national monument in the very center of Jakarta, which resulted in at least 70 people injured. More than 1,000 police officers stood by and watched the violence. The radical Islamist FPI, wearing long white robes not unlike those of the KKK, regularly attack bars, cafes and pork-selling establishments and other haram establishments. It almost always gets away with its actions, with the state either indirectly supporting the actions or not daring to intervene.

Ahmadiyah is one of the oldest Muslim sects in Indonesia, with 500,000 members and over 80 years of history. Yet it has suffered from countless attacks, their houses of worship burned down. The fundamentalist mainstream has pressured the Indonesian government to ban Ahmadiyah from preaching in public.

In August 2007, more than 70,000 members from around the Muslim world descended on Jakarta to call for a caliphate — or Islamic rule — in Southeast Asia. The government authorities allowed them to use biggest stadium in Central Jakarta, despite the fact that the group is banned in most of the countries in the Middle East.

"There is nothing we can do to stop this," said Ditasari a political leader and former head of PRD, the only progressive opposition party in Indonesia that emerged during the so-called reformation period. "Indonesia has been hijacked by Islamists, and religion is in full control of society. We can't reverse the process anymore. We can only slow it down to some degree." Ditasari added: "This presidency is the worst thing that could have happened to Indonesia. Not because Yudhoyono is evil, but because he is too weak to confront the religious extremism, corruption and other major problems that Indonesia is facing. He is not willing to take decisive action to defend the constitution."

The government's recent Electronic Information and Transactions Law bans pornographic websites. But it also bans the spread of "false news" and "racial and religious hate messages." The government could very well interpret these phrases to include any news or comment not approved by the establishment, as well as criticism of the religion. In December 2008, the government ratified the law and thereby criminalized any sex-related materials deemed to violate public morality, including traditional and modern music and dances, as well as dresses worn by women in different parts of archipelago.

Finally, several parts of Indonesia, most notably West Java and North Sumatra, are now controlled by Sharia law, which imposes religious justice and dictates the dress code for women. The current administration has done nothing to stop this trend.

Political Intolerance

Political killings and gross human rights violations take place regularly throughout the Indonesian archipelago. However, the international press has only covered the most extreme cases, such as the murder of human rights and anti-corruption activist Munir Said Thalib in 2004, onboard a Garuda Indonesia Airlines flight bound for Amsterdam via Singapore, allegedly by a Garuda pilot and an Indonesian intelligence officer.

"Since 1965, Indonesia was a staunch U.S. ally," says Nursyahbani Katjasungkana, a member of the House of Representatives from the progressive Islamic National Awakening Party. "And those who forged such an alliance here and there control the mass media, so the criticism of the human rights in Indonesia very rarely makes headlines here or there."

In December 2008, for instance, police officers and hired guns for the Arara Abadi Corporation attacked a peasant community in Riau province to gain control of the land, arresting 200 peasants, destroying 700 houses, and forcing 400 people to hide in the forest.

This year, once again, Fadjroel Rachman tried to run as an independent presidential candidate. The Constitutional Court rejected his candidacy, upholding the rule that a presidential candidate must be from a party or coalition of parties that won at least 20% of the votes. This rule effectively disqualifies anyone not deeply rooted in the regime.

Rachman is critical of the current government's pornography law and its intolerant approach to religion. "The fight for democracy and democratic Islam has deep roots in Indonesian society, but it has nothing to do with the present administration," he says, zeroing in on a specific piece of legislation the government has failed to back. "Right now Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono isn't willing to even issue a government decree introducing affirmative action for women in parliament, a plan that would set aside 30% seats in the Parliament for women. The hard work of all those who fought for this affirmative action goes to waste."

Economic Intolerance

The gap between the rich and the poor is greater in Indonesia than almost anywhere else. Jakarta is a city of luxury hotels and malls, with children playing in open sewers nearby. By the international poverty living standard of $2 dollars a day, more than half the population of Indonesia is poor.

"I just came back from Riau, a very wealthy province with 8% economic growth and trillions of Rupiah in their annual budget," says leading Indonesian human rights lawyer Todung Mulya Lubis. "But they said that there are at least 1 million people that do not have electricity there."

In 2006, a mining accident left more than 50,000 people homeless in Porong. Lapindo Brantas, the company responsible, is owned by the family of welfare minister Aburizal Bakrie. Last year, Forbes listed Bakrie as Indonesia's richest man with a total fortune of about $9 billion. Bakrie retained his job and refused, until very recently, to pay any compensation to the victims. "The victims not only lost land, schools, houses, and other buildings," says Lubis. "They lost a collective identity - the place they belonged to for a very long time. The fact that Bumi (one of the Bakrie's close associates) bought three oil companies after the disaster should show the government that they do have money, just that they don't want to spend it on compensating the victims."

Ethnic Intolerance

Indonesia has occupied West Papua in much the same way that it occupied East Timor. "An estimated 100,000 Papuans, or 10% of the population, have been killed by the Indonesian military. This is a fraction of the true figure, according to refugees," wrote journalist John Pilger. He quoted a refugee who made it to Australia after a harrowing trip by canoe: "They treat West Papuans like animals. They kill us like animals. They have created militias and jihadis to do just that. It is the same as East Timor."

The United States, like other countries, has economic interests in West Papua, and so have looked the other way at Indonesia's conduct there. These oil and mining interests supply the Indonesian government and U.S. with companies billions of dollars annually. Meanwhile, the economic conditions in West Papua are appalling, with health indicators considerably below the Indonesian average.

A new nonviolent movement is taking shape in West Papua, largely replacing an armed struggle that failed to achieve its objectives or international support.

U.S. Policy

The United States and Australia helped plan the 1965 coup that sidelined progressive leader Sukarno and brought in the military clique of General Suharto. Around 2 million people died — communists, union leaders, teachers, artists, and members of the Chinese minority. The United States also supported Indonesia's invasion of East Timor in December 1975, which resulted in one-third of the population either killed or starved to death.

Indonesia is once again important for the United States. There are still plenty of raw materials in Papua and elsewhere, as well as untapped oil resources. There is, of course, China, which the United States tries to isolate militarily. And there is Indonesia's connection to the Muslim world. "Indonesia has a larger Muslim population than any other country," says Nursyahbani Katjasungkana. "The United States thinks that Indonesia can control or at least influence Muslim population all over the world – under the U.S. leadership, of course!"

Obama lived in Indonesia as a child, shortly after the 1965 coup. He was known as "Barry from Menteng," after the neighborhood where he lived. His step-father was an Indonesian army officer. If Obama wasn't aware of this history as he grew up, he certainly should know it by now.

To break with the shameful past the United States played in this part of the world, the Obama administration should finally tell the truth, instead of showering the Indonesian establishment with sweet bouquets of clichés. He should speak the truth about what happened in 1965, about East Timor, about Papua and the role that big business played and still plays in this unfortunate country. It's his obligation, both as "Barry from Menteng" and as the president of the United States.

 

Andre Vltchek is a novelist, journalist, filmmaker, and playwright, co-founder of Mainstay Press, and a senior fellow at The Oakland Institute. A contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus, he is presently living and working in Southeast Asia and East Africa, and can be reached at: andre-wcn (at) usa (dot) net.

 

Subscribe to
World Beat

FPIF's weekly ezine


Support FPIF


Published by Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF), a project of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS, online at www.ips-dc.org). Copyright © 2009, Institute for Policy Studies.

Recommended citation:
Andre Vltchek, "Clinton in Indonesia: What She Missed," (Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus, March 18, 2009).

Web location:
http://fpif.org/fpiftxt/5966

Production Information:
Author(s): Andre Vltchek
Editor(s): John Feffer
Production: Jen Doak

Latest Comments & Conversation Area
Editor's Note: FPIF.org editors read and approve each comment. Comments are checked for content only; spelling and grammar errors are not corrected and comments that include vulgar language or libelous content are rejected.
 
Name Andrew Johnson Date: Mar 18, 2009
The US government has not always overlooked foreign policy issues, the Congress for example in 2005 attempted to ask questions about West Papua, unfortunately Pres. Gen. Yudohono did not approve of the US asking questions. Instead of modifying Section 1115, the US Senate deleted it.

I hope FPIF readers appreciate the importance of knowing foreign issues for domestic as well as foreign policy decisions. Indonesia demonstrates the re-writing of history which Orwell was warning the world of; the United Nations did not create 'Indonesia' in 1949, the UN created a federation that was crushed in 1950 by the 'Republic of Indonesia'. The colonization and attempted ethnic cleansing of East Timor and now West Papua were 'minor' issues, the economic issues were Conoco Phillips gaining Portugal Oil assets in Timor, and Freeport gaining gold and copper assets of West Papua.

Name Micheal Merah Date: Mar 19, 2009
Dear Andre Vltchek:

As an American now living in Indonesia, and as someone who reads historically researched writing concerning Indonesia, I take great interest in your journalism. Though I have only read a few of your articles, they always provide great food for my own thought and continued research to uncover the truth of Indonesia's history.

One challenging difficulty in what you do, I suppose, is in corroborating your research. Because many of the violations of human rights you report on have been covered-up and hidden from public scrutiny, it makes the task all the more difficult. But this observation is just an aside. Whether you can be confident in 100% of what you report is probably besides the point. The thrust of it clearly carries a consistent theme, and anyone who cares about Indonesia human rights should carefully consider your opinions and insights. There is plenty of evidence for much of what you use to support your views.

But in this most recent article re: Clinton's visit to Indonesia, I do take issue with you describing Sukarno as a "progressive leader." This was mentioned in passing, and in context of the CIA-backed coup to depose Sukarno in favor of Suharto. I have no doubt the CIA was involved in 1965. Though the extent to which the CIA was involved in 1965 is still unclear, certainly their failed attempt at a coup in Operation Haik (1958) was recently detailed in Tom Cooper's book, Clandestine US Operations: Indonesia 1958, Operation "Haik". (For CIA watchers, Operation Haik holds a special place in the agency's history, as it stands out as a most spectacular failure, even in light of the fact that in the early years, the CIA failed miserably at most of what they pursued.)

And for the purposes of your article, whose goal was to provide an overview, the question of Sukarno's progressiveness may be a moot point. Still, the subject of Sukarno is a compelling one, and deserves a resurrection. Sukarno was a shrewd and complicated politician. He did good, and he did substantial harm. He often didn't help himself or his country much because he was also a great gambler. Witness how he played the Soviet Union off of the United States. He showed no hesitation in leveraging Cold War politics in his nationalist pursuits. To that end, he most likely signed his death warrant as Indonesian president. Upon turning to Moscow after the U.S. denied him arms, the U.S. and CIA found grounds for disposing of him.

Though most of the most grievous atrocities perpetrated against the Papuans occurred after Sukarno's fall, he certainly initiated the invasions and politicked President Kennedy to gain U.S. support for Indonesian takeover. I'm not sure this is what might be termed "progressive." Sukarno's military threats against Malaysia and Brunei also demonstrate his aggressiveness in the greater region. Certainly Indonesia does not bluster like this today, though East Timor is still recent enough in history to give one pause.

In the years leading up to the actual revolution, the Hatta-Sukarno team did provide progressive leadership. They succeeded in chartering out democratic ideals, Indonesian-style. At least on paper, both the Panca Sila and original Indonesian constitution provide admirable foundation for the formulation of a reasonably fair-minded Indonesian Republic. Agreed: a lack of adherence to "rule by law" has created a post-independence history that is often disheartening and has helped corruption to thrive.

As someone who has lived and taught and has married here in Indonesia, I do care about the country. My own view is that what plagues Indonesia most is its poverty. Many of its persistent faults- such as widespread corruption- is a direct reflection of continued poverty, lack of education, lack of opportunity, and maldistribution of services and wealth. Specifically, East Indonesia has been sorely neglected. Conditions in Nusa Tenggara Timur and parts of the Molukas (let alone Papua) are national disgraces. Child malnutrition and child labor are on the rise in Nusa Tenggara as a whole.

I do see evidence of "progress" in Indonesia, though. It is not all bad news, and even though, for instance, SBY has not shown the spine to suppress the vicious attacks against groups such as Ahmadiyah, there is reason to believe religious intolerance is not winning in Indonesia. The Chinese Indonesian population, for instance, have had many of their rights returned or otherwise legally acknowledged after the harsh suppression of the Suharto years. One could say cynically that this is only due to the fact that the Chinese Indonesians are the most economically powerful minority in the country, but the addition of Confucianism as a state recognized religion has to be taken as a good sign, post-Suharto. But having said that, I will concede: Although the terrible sectarian strife that plagued the Molukas and Central Sulawesi has subsided, and many of the displaced peoples have been able to return home, the threat of future upheaval is always a possibility. And as long as their is significant poverty is Indonesia, that will be the case.

In the light of all the violations and atrocities as perpetrated by the government, military, and fanatic religious groups (both Christian and Muslim), the better angels that mark the more charitable side of the Indonesian character is cause for hope. Many people in Indonesia are indeed tolerant, and many local regions practice toleration in their dealings with each other. It is a vast archipelago here, and I think it pays to be careful when brandishing the term "intolerance." It certainly exists- as it does in all countries- but I daily witness evidence to the contrary.

Gotong Royong is in powerful competition with both intolerance and corruption. The battle of these polar principals constitute much of the day-to-day drama of Indonesian life. I will continue to look for and read your good work. You're fighting for a crucial cause, and I fully support it.

Name Rey Date: Mar 19, 2009
I am an Indonesian, a moslem, living in Java but often goes to Banda Aceh, where the Sharia law is being applied. I should say that this writing is a bit biased and does not entirely reflect the truth and / or the condition on the field, and only seen from one perspective.

I am sorry to say that, but that is the fact that I see. I would have mentioned it one by one but it will be too many of it... Please to be more objective and to understand more on the context, including the bigger frame which covers what has been going on...

 
You may add a new comment here. It will not appear on this page until it has been approved by the moderator.
Your Name:
Comment:
 
Contact FPIF's webmaster with inquiries regarding the functionality of this website.
Copyright © 2009, Institute for Policy Studies.
 

Support FPIF

You Might Also Like:
 

Related Coverage of Asia/Pacific

Why the Afghan Surge Will Fail
Nov 12, 2009

'Legitimacy' in Afghanistan
Nov 12, 2009

North Korea: Journalists vs. Diplomats
Nov 9, 2009