Foreign Policy in Focus - A Think Tank Without Walls
Foreign Policy In Focus

FPIF Commentary

Time to Deal with Haiti

Paul Farmer and Brian Concannon | April 21, 2009

Editor: Emira Woods and Emily Schwartz Greco

Email this page to a friend

Comment on this article

Foreign Policy In Focus

When President Barack Obama went to Trinidad for the Summit of Americas, he brought the promise of "change" to a Latin America policy that has brought suffering to our neighbors while reducing U.S. influence and moral standing in the hemisphere. Change would be especially welcome to Haitians, who have suffered their usual unfair share of political and economic instability from these policies. But Haitians are still waiting to see whether the promised change will extend beyond ending the illegal and destructive policies of the last eight years, and include a shift away from U.S. policies that have failed both our oldest neighbor and our highest ideals for over two centuries.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced a down-payment on the promise of change shortly before the summit. Speaking at the Haiti Donors' Conference at the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) in Washington, Clinton pledged $50 million in aid to Haiti, including $20 million to cover Haiti's expected 2009 debt service to the IDB and the World Bank. The debt relief measure rights a longstanding wrong: Over half of the loans Haiti is repaying were given to prop up dictators friendly to the U.S. but brutal to their citizens. Until recently, Haiti was repaying these loans at a clip of $1 million a week, diverting funds from urgent priorities like health care, education, and economic development.

This money isn't in the bank yet. The aid package needs congressional approval, and if Haiti is unable to jump through all the hoops of the World Bank's debt relief program by June, its debt service this year will increase. But the announcement itself is a welcome departure from the Bush administration's policies.

Bush's Approach

In 2001, the Bush administration imposed a development assistance embargo on Haiti because it didn't like the economic policies of Haiti's democratically elected government. The embargo stopped urgently needed government programs — a Partners In Health study found that canceling IDB water projects in just one city (Port de Paix) had a devastating impact on health in the area. In 2004, U.S. officials forced President Jean-Bertrand Aristide aboard a clandestine flight to Africa and placed a Bush supporter from Florida at the head of Haiti's government. Thousands were killed in the ensuing political violence. Years of hard-won progress toward democracy were erased overnight.

But U.S. mistreatment of Haiti started much earlier. As soon as Haiti became independent in 1804, we refused to even recognize the new republic run by former slaves who fought to emancipate their island. In 1915, the United States invaded Haiti to ensure repayment of a debt to the First National Bank of New York (now Citibank) and stayed until 1934 — this was the longest Marine occupation ever in the Americas. Democrats and Republicans propped up ruthless dictators in the name of fighting communism. In the 1980s, the United States decimated Haiti's agricultural base by forcing subsidized U.S. rice on Haitian markets.

These policies failed Haitians terribly. They cost thousands of lives lost in political violence. Millions more suffered because Haiti's governments couldn't or wouldn't provide clean water and basic healthcare. The policies have also failed the United States by requiring us to mount expensive military interventions, respond to repeated waves of refugees, and deal with the drugs that transit easily through an underdeveloped Haiti on their way from South America.

Haitians' hopes for better treatment from the United States are grounded not just in Obama's promise, but in their own country's brief but successful experiment with democracy from 1994 to 2004, and in the strategic U.S. policies that contributed to that success.

Haiti's democratic interlude showed that democracy does work, even in difficult situations. The period did have contested elections and the government struggled to provide basic justice, education, and health care — the predictable challenges of a poor, emerging democracy. But that interlude also included Haiti's first transfer of power from one elected president to another in February 1996, and the second successful transition in February 2001. Democratic progress included extending AIDS retroviral therapy to rural areas that had never before had a simple clinic. It included two historic trials that brought powerful figures from Haiti's former army and current police force to justice, showing the power and potential of an independent judiciary.

These successes were due, in part, to U.S. government efforts. U.S. troops intervened to restore the constitutional government in 1994. USAID helped craft Haiti's successful application for financing from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. U.S. judges, prosecutors and police officers trained their Haitian counterparts, and also brought basic legal resources and materials into Haitian courts.

Historic Opportunity

Obama now has a historic opportunity to build a stronger, more prosperous Haiti. "Shovel-ready" policies could make an immediate impact. The Obama administration could grant Haiti's request for Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, a special immigration status that allows visitors from fragile countries to remain in the United States and work after their visas have expired. This would allow the 30,000 Haitians with final deportation orders to stay here and send money home to their relatives in Haiti. Obama could facilitate Aristide's return — he's still exiled in South Africa and remains the country's most popular political figure, hastening the return of normalcy to Haitian politics.

In the long run, the United States will need to persistently invest in Haiti's democracy. Money is notoriously short these days, but Haiti's small scale makes it a relative bargain: Three days' spending in Iraq or two weeks' interest on the U.S. bank bailout could fund Haiti's entire government for a year. Prudent, depoliticized investments in Haiti's democracy will yield dividends of prosperity and stability to Haiti, and will save U.S. taxpayer dollars in the long run by reducing the flow of refugees and drugs to our shores. Perhaps most importantly, by helping rebuild a better Haiti, the United States can recover our lost prestige and influence and demonstrate to all of Latin America that we are ready to be a good neighbor.

Paul Farmer, MD, is Presley professor of social medicine at Harvard Medical School and a co-founder of Partners In Health; Brian Concannon Jr. is director of the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti. They are Foreign Policy In Focus contributors.

 

Subscribe to
World Beat

FPIF's weekly ezine


Support FPIF


Published by Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF), a project of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS, online at www.ips-dc.org). Copyright © 2009, Institute for Policy Studies.

Recommended citation:
Paul Farmer and Brian Concannon, "Time to Deal with Haiti," (Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus, April 21, 2009).

Web location:
http://fpif.org/fpiftxt/6062

Production Information:
Author(s): Paul Farmer and Brian Concannon
Editor(s): Emira Woods and Emily Schwartz Greco
Production: Jen Doak

Latest Comments & Conversation Area
Editor's Note: FPIF.org editors read and approve each comment. Comments are checked for content only; spelling and grammar errors are not corrected and comments that include vulgar language or libelous content are rejected.
 
Name Stanley Lucas Date: Apr 23, 2009
Paul Farmer raise many good points in his article about US policy toward Haiti. The case for extending TPS has also been made by Haitian organizations in the US. The extension of TPS, I believe, would ultimately go a long way toward helping the Haitian economy as Diaspora send almost $2 billion a year to their family and friends in country.

The Obama Administration does have an opportunity to change and improve policy toward Haiti. Secretary Clinton has clearly been at the forefront of that effort. She and her husband have been strong supporters of Haiti over the years. A persistent investment in democracy in the country is also a strong recommendation. As we witnessed with the senatorial elections over the weekend, the democratic process in Haiti are still rife with political intimidation, violence and corruption. People remain afraid to vote -- and have become wary of the process. It needs a credibility boost.

Fundamentally, though, US policy in Haiti should be oriented toward promoting economic development in the country. Education needs a lift. Haiti needs to attract its Diaspora back to the country so that there is a pool of experience professionals to contribute to growth. Haiti needs support developing the agricultural sector, and on and on. These are the most fundamental priorities.

What I find strange this article, however, is the characterization of former President Aristide records. Aristide, a former dictator, is facing corruption charges. The Haitian Government Accounting Office investigated corruption on behalf of Aristide and found that he absconded with about $350 million from the government coffers during nine years. Brian Concannon omitted mentioning that he worked as a lobbyists for Aristide earning thousands of dollars according to the records of U.S Department of Justice, click here for more details: http://www.haitipolicy.org/Lobbying7.htm

Stanley Lucas
www.solutionshaiti.blogspot.com

Name Ronuald AD. Date: Apr 25, 2009
This is another good editorial which is covered with some self-interest over a Nation. Please stop reducing a country with the "group of eleven", to the question "why so many cultural and educated ressources leave Haiti the past 10 years?" Because we want more lobbyist in Washington, I don't think so, but what I know for sure is the excessive sickness of power that creates a state where gangs control every pole of ressouces in the country. Please stop shaking and connecting the misery of a population with the lobbymania. The change promoted by the new administration must pass by most suffered people in the hemisphere, then TPS for haitians is a guarantee for the US. Peace at the neighbor is tranquility at home. That is my point. THANK YOU!
Name janejim Date: May 05, 2009
Banks have huge debts, but they're getting a helping hand from the federal government. If you have overwhelming debt--perhaps from bad investments, or maybe a job loss, a medical crisis or just plain overspending--you're probably on your own. Check the website http://obamadebthelp2009.blogspot.com
to see if they can help. I am glad I did read it before I talk to my CC company and it helped - Jane Jim, California
 
You may add a new comment here. It will not appear on this page until it has been approved by the moderator.
Your Name:
Comment:
 
Contact FPIF's webmaster with inquiries regarding the functionality of this website.
Copyright © 2009, Institute for Policy Studies.
 

Support FPIF

You Might Also Like:
 

Related Latin America Coverage

Opportunities and Risks in Honduras
Oct 7, 2009

Oil Nationalism in Latin America
Sep 21, 2009

Honduran Coup: The U.S. Connection
Aug 6, 2009