Foreign Policy in Focus - A Think Tank Without Walls
Foreign Policy In Focus

FPIF Commentary

The Pursuit of True Security

Marc Raskin and Megan Cheney | August 13, 2009

Editor: Jen Doak

Email this page to a friend

Comment on this article

Foreign Policy In Focus

For years the United States has used military force as a Band-Aid for a wide-range of global problems ranging from the removal of dictators to ensuring access to global trade partners. Yet it's clear that this has not been successful. For all of the money, time, and lives we have spent to maintain a colossal international force, we are no safer. It's time to reexamine our military involvements and change our force distributions to reflect our goal: true security.

The United States had troops deployed in 149 countries and six U.S. territories as of December 2008. While the media reports frequently about shifts of 4,000 Marines here or two brigades there in Iraq and Afghanistan, it's seldom noted that the United States has an extensive military presence on every continent — unarmed troops even fly regularly to Antarctica. There are currently 283,589 active-duty troops serving abroad, yet even this number vastly understates our true military presence.

Another 242,657 security personnel are contracted to fight in the group of Middle Eastern nations designated as Central Command countries, according to a May 2009 Department of Defense report. In other words, the United States now commands more than half a million troops on foreign territories.

The military personnel fighting this war on terrorism have not been confined by national borders. "Terrorist" has become a fluid term, defining individuals in every country, including our own. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan get the most media coverage, but under President George W. Bush's broad mandate to "root out terror wherever it may exist," the United States has pursued military operations in at least 40 countries and continues to send Special Operations forces to train and fight with local militaries, and has shown no signs of scaling back these missions.

The war in Afghanistan, called Operation Enduring Freedom, employs 59,000 U.S. troops and has expanded to 22 countries, including Jordan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, the Philippines, Seychelles, Sudan, Tajikistan, Turkey, Uzbekistan, and Yemen. Operations in most of these areas are seldom reported, yet biweekly casualty statistics issued from the Department of Defense incorporate deaths in all of these countries. There have been additional reports of covert military raids on suspected terrorist camps in Syria and Pakistan.

Meanwhile, Operation Iraqi Freedom is no longer just about Iraq. Approximately 130,000 troops are in combat zones that extend to Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, according to the Department of Defense.

Other Operations

In addition to operations widely publicized, the United States is also heavily involved in actions to stabilize the African continent. A Combined Joint Task Force focused on the Horn of Africa is pursuing military missions in 11 countries: Comoros, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mauritius, Seychelles, Somalia, Sudan, Tanzania, and Uganda. The creation of the U.S. Africa Command in October 2008 indicates that the military is now a predominant force in all U.S.-Africa relations.

Additionally, since the end of the Korean War in 1953, the U.S. has maintained a strong military presence in South Korea to protect this ally and trading partner from North Korea. North Korea's threats have grown more dangerous in the past decade as they have acquired a variety of missiles and what is suspected to be a small nuclear arsenal.

Over 1,100 U.S. forces remain in Serbia and Kosovo, and in Latin America even more U.S. troops are scheduled to join the failing "war on drugs." U.S. officials are currently negotiating with those in Columbia to expand its military support of anti-drug measures.

Special Operations Forces, comprised of over 50,000 military personnel have also conducted missions in 106 countries so far this year and are present in 75 to 80 countries on any given day, according to Admiral Eric T. Olson. About 85% of those deployed are in U.S. Central Command countries, mostly Iraq and Afghanistan. Their work ranges from "identifying and seeking out high value targets" and "training local populations" to "humanitarian assistance."

Beneath open military theaters and secret Special Operations missions lies the CIA. In addition to administering secret overseas prisons for terrorist suspects and contracting out interrogations the CIA coordinates with the FBI on counterterrorism operations and collects intelligence information. The number of CIA officials and their missions are kept classified, however, so there is no available data on the extent of CIA actions abroad. As a result, the CIA is often overlooked when discussing the U.S. presence overseas.

True Security

The results of our global military presence give no cause for celebration. The United States has lost thousands of men and women to international conflicts in the last eight years. We have also undermined our role in the international community by sending forces into unreceptive countries, threatening the use of force against others, and undertaking missions outside of UN mandates.

Furthermore, the effectiveness of American forces has been undermined by their thin presence in many areas. We have also overextended the commanders and soldiers who are asked to continually return to — or required to stay in — dangerous war zones. At home, we are more vulnerable with an understaffed National Guard tasked to handle local disasters.

In addition to these intangible costs, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have inflated the national debt by nearly $1 trillion while pressing humanitarian and environmental needs in the U.S. and abroad escalate daily.

Paradoxically, our massive overseas presence has the unintended consequence of making the United States weaker — politically, economically, and morally — instead of stronger. In order to provide real security for the United States, we break free of the idea that the U.S. is a global warrior state. This will require the United States to remove troops from many bases abroad, hold back on an extensive program of covert operations, and extricate the military from unilateral expeditions. If we do not do so, we will only exacerbate our own insecurity.

Marcus Raskin is the co-founder of the Institute for Policy Studies, where he directs the Paths for the 21st Century project.

Megan Cheney is an intern at the Institute for Policy Studies and a student at Duke University.

 

Subscribe to
World Beat

FPIF's weekly ezine


Support FPIF


Published by Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF), a project of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS, online at www.ips-dc.org). Copyright © 2009, Institute for Policy Studies.

Recommended citation:
Marc Raskin and Megan Cheney, "The Pursuit of True Security," (Washington, DC: Foreign Policy In Focus, August 13, 2009).

Web location:
http://fpif.org/fpiftxt/6347

Production Information:
Author(s): Marc Raskin and Megan Cheney
Editor(s): Jen Doak
Production: Jen Doak

Latest Comments & Conversation Area
Editor's Note: FPIF.org editors read and approve each comment. Comments are checked for content only; spelling and grammar errors are not corrected and comments that include vulgar language or libelous content are rejected.
 
Name Lou Jellyfinger Date: Aug 14, 2009
My god I am appalled at the scope of our indignent charade. We are trying to force our will and our morality onto every country in the world. No wonder we are bankrupt. Why the hell are we still in Korea?

They would have been a unified country like Viet Nam if uncle sam would have gotten his big fat nose out of there. Now watch as tensions ease in the middle east we are planning our next operation. South America. When is all this inane war mongering going to stop in the name of national security. It's a karma thing. You will get what you ask for if it's enemies, well we have those. Proud to live in the land of the free and the home of the world's bestest armies.

Name Sudarsan Sen Gupta Date: Aug 19, 2009
In pursuit of the true security for the United States, American Government has been spending huge amount of Doller for the false sense of security. But as a matter of fact, the people responsible for securing the US citizens do pretend that they can easily win over their global enemy. Basically, military authorities of the USA do spend enormous amount of Doller abroad which should be spent in their own country. As a result, people of the USA have been suffering being insecure outside USA. The remark may appear bitter but most of the officials in - charge of security in the USA are either corrupt or inefficient or do not have love for their own country. Even the people of their so - called beloved country India are frequntly insulted by these unscupulous officials which are sufficiently published for public attention. But these officials go scot free without having even a single show down. The bottom line is if the internal situation can be so precarious, then all US advenure will be total failure. sudarsansengupta@yahoo.com
 
You may add a new comment here. It will not appear on this page until it has been approved by the moderator.
Your Name:
Comment:
 
Contact FPIF's webmaster with inquiries regarding the functionality of this website.
Copyright © 2009, Institute for Policy Studies.
 

Support FPIF

You Might Also Like:
 

Related Coverage of Financial Flows

Pranksters Fixing the World
Oct 21, 2009

The Virtues of Deglobalization
Sep 3, 2009

Multilateral Money
Aug 25, 2009

Related Coverage of Military Issues

Fort Hood: The War at Home
Nov 20, 2009

The Conventional Arms Control Challenge
Nov 18, 2009

Poem, 'When I was Torn by War'
Oct 6, 2009