he
post-cold war world is marked by an emergence, proliferation, and expansion
of a wide array of transnational, citizen-based initiatives to address
international economic, political, ecological, and social issues and
crises. These citizen-based movements are often publicly identified
with the mobilizations at the WTO Ministerial Meeting in Seattle, 1999.
A crucial fault-line in many of these networks is that
Southern and Northern members often have different perspectives about
the character of the problem and about the focus of proposed solutions.
(Recognizing, of course, that within both North and South there are
often differences as well). These divides are all the more important
because the resource inequalities embedded within these movements, coalitions,
and networks is often an obstacle to a full, transparent, and constructive
dialogue.
For example, there is typically controversy over the
meaning and significance of sovereignty that arises in debates over
the appropriate responses to economic globalization, application of
trade sanctions, and the promotion of conditionalities by the international
financial institutions. Also, Southern activists typically fault Northern
activists for failing to address the politico-military dimensions of
globalization.
As part of its mission, the IRC aims to promote strategic
dialogues within and among citizen groups. We aim to maximize the web
and the Internet, as well as more traditional fora, to provides spaces
for the airing of analytical, strategic, and tactical debates among
progressives. We welcome your feedback on how we might do this better.
Please send feedback to John Gershman.
|